|
Welcome to the Nineteenth
Century: Venezuelan Elections
by Fernando Calzadilla
[Abstract en Español]
Printer-friendly
version 
So that a person, is the same that an actor is,
both on the stage and in common conversation;
and to personate, is to act, or represent himself,
or another, and he that acteth another,
is said to bear his person, or act in his name;
- Thomas Hobbes (1)
On
January 1, 1958 I saw warplanes dropping bombs over Caracas. Some
fell in my neighborhood, not far from my own house. Luckily they
didn’t explode, and the damage they caused was limited to
the impact of a heavy object dropped from high up. I didn’t
know that at the time. I was eight years old and didn’t even
know what bombs were. 23 days of street battles ensued, and I saw
bleeding people running down the street, I dodged machine gun fire,
and slept on the floor under the bed because the mattress was a
good protection for stray bullets. On January 23 at 2 a.m. we heard
an airplane, and minutes later cars started to beep and people rushed
to the street to celebrate the dictator’s departure with carnivalesque
frenzy, including allusive floats. Marcos Perez Jimenez will be
remembered as Venezuela’s last dictator. A transitional civic-military
junta in charge of government promised elections by the end of the
year. From now on, we were to live in Democracy.
If we were to distill democracy’s principle to its bare minimum
we would be left with voting. Direct voting to decide a policy,
to administer justice, or to reach a decision on common issues requires
a sharing of space, that is, being there at the same time and place
and having the authority to exercise the vote—authority being
the right to do any action. Most historians agree that the Greek
polis (a Western paradigm of democracy) functioned with five or
six thousand voting members. This number permitted people to gather
in one place and, most important, enabled them to recognize each
other as members of the assembly. Anything beyond that number became
an impractical way of doing politics. Participatory attendance had
no representation; democracy then was a first instance of embodied
practice.
|